TY - JOUR T1 - How Does Subjective Age Get “Under the Skin”? The Association Between Biomarkers and Feeling Older or Younger Than One’s Age: The Health and Retirement Study JF - Innovation in Aging Y1 - 2019 A1 - Bharat Thyagarajan A1 - Shippee, Nathan A1 - Parsons, Helen A1 - Vivek, Sithara A1 - Eileen M. Crimmins A1 - Jessica Faul A1 - Shippee, Tetyana KW - Age discrepancy score KW - Biological domains KW - Physiological aging AB - Though subjective age is a well-recognized risk factor for several chronic diseases, the biological basis for these associations remains poorly understood.We used new comprehensive biomarker data from the 2016 wave of the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to evaluate the association between biomarker levels and self-reported subjective age in a subset of 3,740 HRS participants who provided a blood sample. We measured biomarkers in seven biological domains associated with aging: inflammation, glycemia, lipids, liver function, endocrine function, renal function, and cardiac function. The primary outcome was the age discrepancy score (subjective age − chronological age) categorized as those who felt younger, older, or the same as their chronological age (reference group). Analyses adjusted for comprehensive psychosocial factors (chronic stress index, depression score), demographic factors (race, sex, body mass index, marital status, physical activity), and prevalence of chronic health conditions (comorbidity index).The prevalence of clinically relevant reduced levels of albumin concentrations was lower in those who felt younger (8.8\% vs. 16.0\%; p = .006) and higher in those who felt older (20.4\% vs. 16.0\%; p = .03) when compared with the reference category. The prevalence of clinically significant elevation in liver enzymes such as alanine aminotransferase was also significantly lower among those who felt younger (7.1\% vs. 8.6\%; p = .04) when compared with the reference category. Prevalence of clinically elevated levels in cystatin C was also lower among those who felt younger when compared with the reference category (50.0\% vs. 59.1\%; p = .04). There was no association between lipids, glucose, or C-reactive protein (inflammatory marker) and subjective age categories.These results suggest that people who feel younger may have favorable biomarker profiles and as a result may have lower prevalence of age-related diseases when compared with those who feel older or those who feel the same as their chronological age. VL - 3 IS - 4 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Later-Life Disability in Environmental Context: Why Living Arrangements Matter. JF - Gerontologist Y1 - 2018 A1 - Carrie Elizabeth Henning-Smith A1 - Shippee, Tetyana A1 - Benjamin D Capistrant KW - Disabilities KW - Living arrangements KW - Nursing homes KW - Older Adults AB -

Background and Objectives: Household social and environmental context are key elements of the disablement process, yet few studies explicitly examine the relationship between household composition, housing type, and disability progression. This study investigates the risk of older adults' disability progression by type of living arrangement (e.g., household composition, housing type) and whether the relationship varies by socioeconomic status.

Research Design and Methods: We used Health and Retirement Study data (waves 1998-2012; n = 41,467 total observations) and fit time-series logistic regression models to estimate increases in activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) limitations. Because living arrangements are influenced by financial resources, we also stratified analyses by wealth.

Results: Disability rates were highest among those living alone or with nonfamily others and in self-described fair/poor quality housing. Overall, disability risk was more strongly associated with wealth than living arrangements. For more affluent older adults, living alone was associated with a decreased risk of IADL disability; for the least affluent older adults, living alone had the opposite association-increased risk of both ADL and IADL disability.

Discussion and Implications: Later-life disability progression should be understood in the context of both household environment and wealth. Household composition and housing characteristics were associated with disability progression and the risk of increasing disability was consistently higher for those in the lowest wealth quintile. These findings identify where older adults with disabilities live and that comprehensive interventions to reduce disability progression should consider household social and environmental context, as well as wealth.

VL - 58 IS - 5 ER -